Stride Frequency vs Stride Length: Which One to Change?

Jeff Gaudette, MS   |

Stride frequency is the number of strides or steps you take per minute, and 85 strides per minute equals 170 steps per minute, the unit most running watches call cadence.

Your running pace is step length multiplied by step rate, and up to about 3:50 per mile (2:23 per km) runners speed up mainly by lengthening their stride.

Raising your step rate by 5% at the same pace reduces the energy your knee absorbs on landing, and a 10% increase also reduces hip loading and cuts peak kneecap force by 14%.

Increasing stride frequency lowers impact loading rate, and a loading rate above 66 body weights per second came with 2.72 times the odds of a medically diagnosed injury, but the direct injury evidence is limited to kneecap pain.

New runners chose a stride frequency about 8% below their most efficient rate, while trained runners were about 3% below theirs.

To increase cadence, raise it 5% to 10% with a metronome or music, and expect about 12 more steps per minute after several sessions.

Coaches have yelled “quick feet” at tired runners for decades, usually on the last lap, when your stride starts to stretch out into a long, loping gait.

Your running speed comes from 2 numbers multiplied together: how long each step is and how many steps you take per minute.

Researchers have now run dozens of studies on the second number, because changing it also changes how much load your hips and knees absorb on every step.

In this article, you’ll learn:

  • The difference between stride frequency, step rate, and cadence
  • How stride length and stride frequency combine to set your pace
  • What a 5% or 10% faster step rate does to the load on your knees and hips
  • Whether quicker steps lower your injury risk
  • Why beginners often pick a stride frequency below their most efficient one
  • How to measure your stride frequency and raise it without wrecking your form

What Is Stride Frequency in Running?

Stride frequency is how many strides you take per minute of running, and runners and watches use it interchangeably with step rate and cadence.

The terms trip people up because a stride and a step are technically different. A step runs from one foot landing to the other foot landing, and a stride is 2 steps, from one foot landing to that same foot landing again.

That means 85 strides per minute and 170 steps per minute describe the same runner.

This article uses steps per minute, the unit most running watches show, and converts any study that reported strides.

In one of the studies below, new runners chose about 156 steps per minute and trained runners about 169, and your own number rises as you speed up. If you want to see where your height puts you in that range, our guide to running cadence by height breaks it down.

How Do Stride Length and Stride Frequency Make You Faster?

Your pace is your step length multiplied by your step rate, so you can only speed up by covering more ground per step, taking more steps per minute, or both.

As an example, 8:00/mi (4:58/km) pace is 3.35 meters per second.

At 160 steps per minute, each step has to cover about 1.26 meters to hold that pace. Bump your rate to 180 steps per minute and each step only needs to cover about 1.12 meters.

Line chart showing the step length needed to hold 7:00 to 10:00 per mile pace at cadences from 155 to 185 steps per minute, with 8:00/mi needing 1.26 m per step at 160 and 1.12 m at 180

At distance-running speeds, you get most of your extra speed from covering more ground with each step. A 2012 study modeled the leg muscles of runners from a slow jog to an all-out sprint.

Up to 7 meters per second, about 3:50/mi (2:23/km), those runners sped up mainly by lengthening their stride.

Your calf muscles produce most of that extra step length. The more force they push into the ground, the more time you spend in the air and the more ground each step covers.

Only above 7 meters per second, well into sprinting, did the runners shift to swinging their legs through faster.

Up to about 3:50/mi (2:23/km), runners speed up mainly by pushing harder into the ground to lengthen each stride.

At an easy pace, the case for changing your stride frequency rests on how it loads your knees and hips.

RunnersConnect Bonus

Download your FREE Guide to Minimalist Running.

Giving you an easy to follow, printable guidelines for how to adjust your training, slowly add-in barefoot running, and the exact strength routine you need to get your feet healthy and strong!


GET MY GUIDE

What Happens to Your Knees and Hips When You Take Quicker Steps?

Taking quicker steps at the same pace shortens each step, which lowers the load your knees and hips have to absorb every time your foot lands.

research
Research has shown that a 5% faster step rate cuts the energy your knee absorbs on landing, and a 10% faster rate cuts hip loading too.

The 45 runners in that study also rose and fell less with each step, and their knee bent less on landing. Dropping step rate 10% below their natural rhythm raised the load at the hip, knee, and ankle.

The same research group went on to estimate the force on the kneecap. In 30 healthy runners, a 10% faster step rate cut peak force between the kneecap and thigh bone by 14%.

That matters if you’ve had runner’s knee, because that joint is where the pain comes from.

A larger analysis backs up the direction of these changes. A 2022 review of 37 studies concluded that raising step rate lowered or didn’t change the forces measured at the ankle, knee, and hip.

Lowering step rate did the reverse, raising those forces or leaving them unchanged.

Does a Higher Stride Frequency Prevent Running Injuries?

Raising your stride frequency lowers the impact measures linked to injury, but no large trial has yet shown that raising it prevents injuries.

The link between impact and injury has firmed up since the early studies, which only looked back at runners who had already been hurt. A 2016 study followed 249 female runners forward in time after measuring how fast force built up when each foot landed.

The women who went on to get a medically diagnosed injury had higher loading rates than the women who never got hurt. Runners above the study’s cutoff for loading rate had 2.72 times the odds of a diagnosed injury.

Raising your step rate lowers that loading rate, and the change sticks. A randomized trial of 30 runners with high impact forces cued them to raise their step rate by 7.5% during 8 outdoor runs with a wireless sensor.

The runners raised their step rate by 8.6%, and their peak loading rate dropped by 17.9%.

The work their knee muscles did to absorb each landing dropped by 21.1% per kilometer, and both changes were still in place a month later.

A 5% to 10% increase in step rate is enough to lower knee loading, and the runners in that trial still held it a month after 8 sessions.

The injury evidence itself is thin. The 2022 review found only 2 studies that measured injury outcomes, and both were in runners with kneecap pain.

Those runners reported less pain and scored higher on questionnaires about daily knee use at 4 and 12 weeks after raising their step rate.

That means a quicker cadence is worth trying if you’ve had kneecap pain, and it lowers the loading rate tied to injury in the 249-runner study.

Is Your Natural Stride Frequency Already the Most Efficient?

Experienced runners tend to settle close to their most efficient stride frequency on their own, while newer runners tend to pick one that’s lower than their optimum.

Stride length follows the same rule. A 1982 study of 10 runners varied their stride length up to 20% of leg length above and below their natural stride and measured their oxygen use each time.

The runners’ own stride used almost exactly the least oxygen, only 0.2 milliliters per kilogram per minute more than their true optimum.

New runners don’t get as close.

research
A 2014 study found that new runners chose a stride frequency about 8% below their most efficient rate, while trained runners chose one about 3% below theirs.

The researchers ran 10 novices and 10 trained runners at 7 different stride frequencies set by a metronome and found the rate where each runner used the least oxygen.

The trained runners chose about 169 steps per minute, against a most efficient rate of about 174 steps per minute. The novices chose about 156 steps per minute, against a most efficient rate of about 170 steps per minute.

That means a newer runner has more room to gain from a small cadence increase, while an experienced runner is already close to the best rate for their body.

Raising your cadence can also feel awkward in the short term. The 2022 review found very limited evidence that runners rated their effort higher right after they increased their step rate.

Chart showing new runners chose 156 steps per minute against a most efficient 170, about 8% below, while trained runners chose 169 against 174, about 3% below

How Do You Measure and Increase Your Stride Frequency?

Check your current step rate on an easy run first, then raise it by 5% to 10% using a metronome or music as the cue.

If your watch doesn’t show cadence, count every time your right foot lands for 30 seconds at your normal easy pace. Multiply that count by 4 to get steps per minute.

Use these steps to change it:

  1. Set a target 5% to 10% above your current rate. If you run 160 steps per minute, aim for 168 to 176. Going from 168 to 180 steps per minute is a 7% change, inside the range the studies tested.
  2. Use a beat to cue it. Set a metronome app, or a playlist with a matching beat, to your target rate and match your footfalls to it.
  3. Start with short blocks. Hold the new rhythm for 3 to 5 minutes inside an easy run, then return to your normal rate and repeat.
  4. Keep your pace the same. Let each step cover less ground so your speed stays the same.
  5. Stop when it feels automatic. Once you hold the new rate without the beat, drop the cue and check your watch now and then.

A 2026 review of 20 studies and 483 runners found that step rate training over several sessions raised step rate by about 12 steps per minute, whichever type of cue the runners used.

Aim for a 5% to 10% increase in stride frequency, even if that leaves you short of the popular 180 steps per minute target.

For drills and form cues that help the new rhythm stick, see our guide on how to increase your running turnover.

Here’s a summary of what the research shows about stride frequency:

Question What the research shows What to do
How do distance runners speed up? Mostly by lengthening their stride, up to about 3:50/mi (2:23/km) Build leg strength to push harder into the ground
What does a quicker step rate do to your joints? +10% cut peak kneecap force by 14% and reduced hip and knee loading Try +5% to +10% if you’ve had knee pain
Does impact matter for injury? Runners above the loading-rate cutoff had 2.72 times the odds of a diagnosed injury Lower your loading rate with quicker, shorter steps
Can you keep a new step rate? +8.6% held a month after 8 sessions Practice with a beat, then drop the cue
Is your natural rate efficient? Novices ran 8% below their optimum, trained runners 3% Newer runners have the most to gain
What is stride frequency in running?

Stride frequency is how many strides you take per minute of running. A stride is 2 steps, from one foot landing to that same foot landing again, so 85 strides per minute equals 170 steps per minute. Runners and running watches usually use stride frequency, step rate, and cadence to mean the same thing, and most watches report it in steps per minute, a number that rises as your pace quickens.

What is the difference between stride length and stride frequency?

Stride length is how much ground you cover with each stride, and stride frequency is how many strides you take per minute. Multiply them together and you get your speed. At 8:00 per mile (4:58 per km), a runner at 160 steps per minute needs about 1.26 meters per step, while a runner at 180 steps per minute needs only about 1.12 meters. Up to about 3:50 per mile, runners get faster mainly by lengthening their stride.

How do you increase your stride frequency?

Measure your current step rate on an easy run, then set a target 5% to 10% higher. Set a metronome app or a playlist to that beat and match your footfalls to it in 3 to 5 minute blocks, keeping your pace the same so each step gets shorter. A 2026 review of 20 studies and 483 runners found that several sessions of step rate training raised step rate by about 12 steps per minute, whichever type of cue runners used.

What did the study on the effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics find?

The 2011 study “Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running” tested 45 runners on a treadmill at their preferred step rate and at 5% and 10% above and below it. A 5% faster step rate reduced the energy absorbed at the knee, and a 10% faster rate reduced it at both the knee and hip. Runners also bounced less and braked less. A 10% slower step rate increased the load at all 3 joints.

Does increasing cadence reduce injury risk?

A higher cadence lowers the impact loading rate, and a 2016 study of 249 female runners found higher loading rates in the women who went on to a medically diagnosed injury. A randomized trial that raised step rate by 8.6% cut peak loading rate by 17.9%, with the change still in place a month later. The direct injury evidence is limited to 2 studies in runners with kneecap pain, who reported less pain after raising their step rate.

Is 180 steps per minute the right cadence for everyone?

No single cadence fits every runner, because step rate changes with your speed and your body. In a 2014 study, trained runners chose about 169 steps per minute and their most efficient rate was about 174 steps per minute, while new runners chose about 156 against a most efficient rate of about 170 steps per minute. Aim for a 5% to 10% increase from your own current rate rather than a fixed number like 180 steps per minute.

Is my natural stride frequency the most efficient?

Experienced runners usually settle close to their most efficient stride frequency on their own. A 1982 study found that runners’ natural stride length used only 0.2 milliliters of oxygen per kilogram per minute more than their true optimum. New runners don’t get as close. In a 2014 study they chose a stride frequency about 8% below their most efficient rate, compared with about 3% below for trained runners, so newer runners have the most room to gain.

How do I calculate my running cadence?

If your watch doesn’t show cadence, count every time your right foot lands for 30 seconds at your normal easy pace, then multiply by 4 to get steps per minute. As an example, 41 right-foot landings in 30 seconds is 164 steps per minute. To find a 5% to 10% target, multiply your cadence by 1.05 and 1.10, which gives about 172 to 180 steps per minute for that runner.

Jeff Gaudette, M.S. Johns Hopkins University

Jeff is the co-founder of RunnersConnect and a former Olympic Trials qualifier.

He began coaching in 2005 and has had success at all levels of coaching; high school, college, local elite, and everyday runners.

Under his tutelage, hundreds of runners have finished their first marathon and he’s helped countless runners qualify for Boston.

He's spent the last 15 years breaking down complicated training concepts into actionable advice for everyday runners. His writings and research can be found in journals, magazines and across the web.

Anderson, Laura M., et al. “What Is the Effect of Changing Running Step Rate on Injury, Performance and Biomechanics? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Sports Medicine – Open, vol. 8, no. 1, 2022, p. 112.

Cavanagh, Peter R., and Keith R. Williams. “The Effect of Stride Length Variation on Oxygen Uptake during Distance Running.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 14, no. 1, 1982, pp. 30-35.

Davis, Irene S., Bradley J. Bowser, and David R. Mullineaux. “Greater Vertical Impact Loading in Female Runners with Medically Diagnosed Injuries: A Prospective Investigation.” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 50, no. 14, 2016, pp. 887-892.

de Ruiter, Cornelis J., et al. “Stride Frequency in Relation to Oxygen Consumption in Experienced and Novice Runners.” European Journal of Sport Science, vol. 14, no. 3, 2014, pp. 251-258.

Dorn, Tim W., Anthony G. Schache, and Marcus G. Pandy. “Muscular Strategy Shift in Human Running: Dependence of Running Speed on Hip and Ankle Muscle Performance.” Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 215, no. 11, 2012, pp. 1944-1956.

Goss, D. D., J. Xu, and J. Hertel. “Effects of Step Rate Based Gait Training on Running Biomechanics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Gait and Posture, vol. 123, 2026, p. 110009.

Heiderscheit, Bryan C., et al. “Effects of Step Rate Manipulation on Joint Mechanics during Running.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 43, no. 2, 2011, pp. 296-302.

Lenhart, Rachel L., et al. “Increasing Running Step Rate Reduces Patellofemoral Joint Forces.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 46, no. 3, 2014, pp. 557-564.

Willy, Richard W., et al. “In-Field Gait Retraining and Mobile Monitoring to Address Running Biomechanics Associated with Tibial Stress Fracture.” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, vol. 26, no. 2, 2016, pp. 197-205.

Picture of Who We Are

Who We Are

Your team of expert coaches and fellow runners dedicated to helping you train smarter, stay healthy and run faster.

We love running and want to spread our expertise and passion to inspire, motivate, and help you achieve your running goals.

4 Responses

  1. While doing my workout yesterday, I decided to count my strides and was surprised by the number I was hitting while doing the speed portion. During my warm up and cool down, I was consistently counting 43…not bad. I played around and was able to hit 45 by shortening up the stride by a hair. During the interval (6:18 pace), however, I was consistently hitting 50! The first time I counted I though maybe I had made a mistake but sure enough, 50 it was. This works out to 20 strides per minute over the “optimal” rate which also translates to 3600 extra strides for a 3hr marathon finish. I focused on lengthening my stride and managed to bring it down to 48 but it took quite a bit of effort. My legs didn’t want to stretch out that far and I’m thinking it may have something to do with my inflexibility. Stretching has always been my main weakness.

    Now I’m wondering, am I using more energy than I should be by running such a high number of strides? Surly this can’t be good. Should I focus on lengthening my stride in order to achieve the optimal 180?

    Thanks for any input.

    Cheers…

  2. That’s actually not too uncommon. As far as efficiency, the research says that your “preferred” stride frequency is the most efficient. Now, whether you could adapt to a lower stride frequency over time and become accustomed to it (and ultimately MORE efficient) is still an open question. I should point out that it isn’t necessarily BAD to be over 180–indeed, elite sprinters have stride frequencies of over 200 when they are running a 10-second 100m! Some people also just naturally take short, choppy strides. There’s no real scientific evidence for this being undesirable, but from a coaching perspective, it just means that when you have to run fast, you’ll mostly be lengthening your stride instead of quickening your stride frequency. So I wouldn’t worry about it TOO much! My brother is a pretty good runner himself and is consistently counts 47 or 48.

  3. Thanks for the info John! When I was trying to increase my stride length, it felt awkward and my feet were pounding harder when hitting the ground. I will continue to experiment and see if I can close the gap a little and still have it feel natural.

    Great having you on here!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *